Week 8 - Where my Eagles will undoubtedly give me a heart attack, and my fantasy teams will attempt to claw their way back to the middle of the pack.
Indianapolis (+9):
This
is a team that deserves its 0-6 record.
However, I cannot fathom laying nine points with a team that just lost
by 34 at home. That said, I have done
the unthinkable in a fantasy league last week and traded for Chris Johnson. Generally,
if conventional wisdom is “x,” there is value in doing “y.” Personal anecdotes notwithstanding, I think
the Colts make a game of this.
Tennessee 20, Indianapolis 17
New Orleans (-13.5):
On
the other hand, the Rams are a team that not only has thoroughly merited their
0-6 record, but has struggled even to play remotely close games. In four of their six games, they would not
have covered a 17-point spread. They
cannot be trusted, even at home.
New Orleans 34, St. Louis 16
NY GIANTS (-9.5):
Tim
Tebow’s first 56 minutes of quarterbacking were ghastly. This 0-7 team could not punish the Broncos
for their ineptitude. I see absolutely
no reason why they should compete with the Giants on the road. I am facing the Giants D in fantasy this week
and I am truly terrified. This one could
(and should) get ugly.
NY Giants 30, Miami 13
Minnesota (+3.5):
I
recognize the superlative talents of Cam Newton. However, this is still a rookie quarterback
who is 2-5. I loved wagering on him to
cover spreads, feeling confident he could muster a garbage time drive, accumulate
some fantasy points, and get his team close at the end. It is another thing entirely to assume that a
rookie will beat a decent NFL team handily.
Yes, I did call the Vikings a decent team, despite their quarterback situation.
Carolina 23, Minnesota 21
Arizona (+12.5):
After
that debacle in Jacksonville, followed by a short-week of preparation, the line
seems large, though I suppose an utter dismantling of the Cardinals at the ends
of darker, more formidable birds seems plausible. Lacking any confidence in this pick, I’ll
take my chances with the Cards ability to play some semblance of defense, and
keep it interesting. Meanwhile, anyone want
an over-under on a team-wide, Sharks vs. Jets style stand-off between the
offense and defense?
Baltimore 20, Arizona 13
HOUSTON (-9.5):
Short-week
for the Jags, huge let-down after their surprising performance on Monday night,
a road game against a team with a much more robust offense, pick one explanation. Either way, the Jags are about to crash down
to earth and remind us all why they were 9-point dogs at home on Monday night
last week.
Houston 27, Jacksonville 14
BUFFALO (-4.5):
The
Redskins are a team quarterbacked by John Beck.
They have lost their previous two games by an average of 10-points to
two teams whose combined record is currently 4-9. They are traveling to face a team whose
offensive weapons are legitimate…and Buffalo’s quarterback might best me on the
Wonderlic.
Buffalo 31, Washington 17
Detroit (-3):
Given
the relative disparity in talent on the remainder of the rosters, wagering on
the Broncos is tantamount to a guess that the Tebow from the final few minutes
will arrive rather than the Tebow from the first 56 minutes. Umm…I’ll take the greater body of
evidence. Moreover, if this game is
close, Skip Bayless’s ego might expand and consume the earth. This cannot be allowed.
Detroit 27, Denver 17
PITTSBURGH (+2.5):
Hardest
game on the board (in my humble opinion).
There are dozens of statistics which suggest the Patriots are the better
team. Brady seems to own the Steelers. However, this is a game in Pittsburgh…in October,
not January. If the Patriots lose, they’ll
be 6-2, having lost to a very good team on the road. Not catastrophic. If the Steelers lose, they’ll be answering
questions about their inability to beat any of the contenders on their schedule
(having already lost to Baltimore & Houston). I think the Steelers handle their business.
Pittsburgh 24, New England 23
SAN FRANCISCO (-9):
Raise
your hand if you believe Colt McCoy can move the ball with any regularity on
the road against a very solid 49ers defense… *waiting* … I did not raise my
hand. Laying nine points with Alex Smith
feels like an act of madness. Betting on
Colt McCoy and a team from Ohio on the road feels like an act of madness. I’ll pick my poison.
San Francisco 23, Cleveland 10
Cincinnati (-1):
Unfortunately,
this game is framed in my mind as the battle between the tangible and the
intangible. There is some intangible
benefit to home games in Seattle.
However, the fact that Seattle’s offense last week made a Big Ten battle
in December, circa 1970 seem like an offensive explosion by comparison is
tangible. The Seahawks can be manhandled
by a competent defense.
Cincinnati 20, Seattle 16
Dallas (+3):
I’m
already nauseated. The best argument in
the Eagles’ favor is “Andy Reid is 12-0 following bye weeks.” What in Andy Reid’s performance this season
suggests that his presence on the Eagles’ sideline is a positive? The next argument is “the Eagles need this
game.” Explain to me why the Cowboys don’t? Nothing, and I mean nothing, would surprise
me in this game, including a 30-point win for either side. Given my utter lack of knowledge and my utter
horror regarding my Eagles in general, I’ll take 3-points and close my eyes.
Philadelphia 27, Dallas 24 (I HOPE)
San Diego (-3):
Arrowhead
home-field advantage on a Monday night…I hate going the other way, but we’re
approaching the time of year where the Chargers turn the corner and besides, I
can’t get excited about Matt Cassel and Jackie Battle. Not confident, but I’ll take Philip Rivers
& co.
San Diego 24, Kansas City 17
No comments:
Post a Comment